{"id":2161,"date":"2012-10-17T03:36:32","date_gmt":"2012-10-17T03:36:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/monachuslex.com\/?p=2161"},"modified":"2012-10-17T03:40:00","modified_gmt":"2012-10-17T03:40:00","slug":"a-seemingly-confused-president-obama-takes-stand-against-gun-owners-during-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/?p=2161","title":{"rendered":"A seemingly confused President Obama takes stand against gun owners during debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-2162\" title=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Obama_Romney-300x187.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"187\" srcset=\"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Obama_Romney-300x187.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Obama_Romney.jpeg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><em>\u201c[F]rankly, in my home town of Chicago, there&#8217;s an awful lot of violence and they&#8217;re not using AK-47s.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">&#8211; President Obama Oct 16, 2012<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">As co-founder and spokesperson for OpenCarry.org, I very much wanted to hear a question about guns put to the candidates. More specifically, like many Americans, I wanted to hear what kind of Supreme Court justices the candidates would nominate where gun rights are concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In fact, we formulated a question that encompassed the core of these concerns and issued a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opencarry.org\/?p=395\" target=\"_blank\">press release<\/a>\u00a0urging that the candidates be asked the following:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>A divided United States Supreme Court has twice ruled by way of razor thin 5 to 4 votes that the Second Amendment \u201c<\/em>guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.<em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>However the 4 dissenting justices in <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">District of Columbia v. Heller<\/span> stated that \u201c<\/em>self-defense . . . is not the [Second] Amendment\u2019s concern.<em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>If you are elected and have the occasion to nominate a Supreme Court justice, will you choose a nominee who believes that the Second Amendment is concerned with the individual right of self-defense, or one who believes that self-defense is not the Second Amendment\u2019s concern?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">However, when a question about guns was finally asked during tonight&#8217;s town-hall style debate it was nothing more than yet another attempt to\u00a0resurrect\u00a0support for <a href=\"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/?p=1574\" target=\"_blank\">the so-called &#8216;assault weapons ban&#8217;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">This question clearly played to the President&#8217;s ideology \u00a0and he took the opportunity to reiterate his support for the failed Clinton-era policy despite his admission that the violence in our cities is not being caused by sporting firearms. Nonetheless, he assured the crowd that he wants to ban them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">He followed this up with a number of statements that seem to indicate that he doesn&#8217;t even understand the difference between fully-automatic weapons and\u00a0the semi-automatic sporting rifles that would <strong>actually<\/strong> be affected by the ban.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">But don&#8217;t take my word for it. Here are some of his comments:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\u201c[W]eapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don&#8217;t belong on our streets.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\u201c[W]hat I want is a \u2014 is a comprehensive strategy. Part of it is seeing if we can get automatic weapons that kill folks in amazing numbers out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Oh yes &#8230; If only someone would regulate fully-automatic firearms, silencers, explosives, and war ordinance. \u00a0You know &#8230; like the United States did <strong>in 1934<\/strong> with the passage of the National Firearms Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">That&#8217;s right folks. \u00a0The \u201c<em>automatic weapons &#8230;\u00a0that were designed for soldiers in war theaters<\/em>\u201d are already heavily regulated and <strong>have been for almost 80 years<\/strong>. And yet the President of the United States is attempting to use them as an election issue in 2012.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">So we are left with two possibilities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">One &#8230; he is so insulated from mainstream America that he truly believes that anyone can walk into a gun store and emerge with a fully-automatic firearm.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Or two &#8230; he is purposefully mis-stating the facts in order to take advantage of undecided voters who are unfamiliar with the country&#8217;s firearms laws.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In either case, it is conduct unbecoming of a president and a clear attack on the rights of gun owners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">And in the meantime, Governor Romney continues to imply that he might support gun control if it were brought to him by a bi-partisan group \u201c<em>coming together.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">People may argue for days as to whether Romney or Obama won the debate but I do know who lost &#8230; the truth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201c[F]rankly, in my home town of Chicago, there&#8217;s an awful lot of violence and they&#8217;re not using AK-47s.\u201d &#8211; President Obama Oct 16, 2012 As co-founder and spokesperson for OpenCarry.org, I very much wanted to hear a question about guns &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/?p=2161\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,35,79,80],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assault-weapons","category-general-civil-rights","category-president-obama","category-presidential-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2161"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2181,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2161\/revisions\/2181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/monachuslex.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}