Maryland returns unprocessed handgun permit applications

Col Marcus Brown, Superintendent MD State Police

I wrote last week about Maryland’s appeal in the Woollard v. Sheridan case.  I also noted that Judge Legg had issued a temporary stay of the ruling pending a May 23rd final hearing on whether or not a permanent stay should be issued until the appeal is heard or rejected.

Today, I was emailed a copy of the following letter.  It was received by one of the many people who had submitted applications to the state of Maryland after the original ruling struck down the requirement that an applicant have a “good and substantial reason” to receive a handgun permit.  One would surmise that a similar letter has been sent to all of the hundreds of applicants who did likewise.

GDE Error: Unable to load requested profile.


The person who sent me the email asked if it would be possible to seek a writ of mandamus forcing the state to process the application.  However, if one reads the letter very carefully, you see that Maryland is not actually refusing to process the application. Rather, they are advising the applicants that, absent the “good and substantial reason” language that is once again required until either the stay is lifted or the appeals court rules, the application will almost certainly be denied.

I am of course deeply disappointed with the state of Maryland for having this requirement to begin with and for appealing Judge Legg’s original ruling striking it down. However, given these facts, I am rather pleasantly surprised that Maryland chose to return the applications along with the accompanying fees rather than simply denying them.  They could just as easily have kept the fees and summarily denied the applications,.  Based upon the history of political bias against gun owners in Maryland, I would not have been surprised at all if that were the approach they had taken.

But there may be a reason for this act of unexpected ‘generosity’ by the state of Maryland. Despite the bravado with which the state is defending their decision to appeal, many legal scholars expect Maryland to lose and they may simply not want to face the flood of lawsuits that would arise from denied applicants in such an eventuality.

I should also note that there is another potential up-side for the applicants. On their permit applications, some states ask whether you have ever been denied a permit in another jurisdiction.  By not being denied in Maryland, these applicants will not have to answer “Yes” to such a question if they apply in another state in the future.

There is an active, ongoing discussion of this issue at the Maryland Shooters forum.

About John Pierce

Monachus Lex is written by Virginia attorney John Pierce. John is a life-long gun rights advocate, an NRA certified instructor and co-founder of the nationwide gun rights group

He has an undergraduate degree in Computer Information Systems, an MBA from George Mason University and is a 2012 Honors Graduate of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, MN.

Professionally, John is a member of the American Bar Association Second Amendment Civil Rights Litigation Subcommittee and his writings have been published by the ABA Civil Rights Litigation Committee and the ABA Minority Trial Lawyer Committee.

In addition, his open carry advocacy has been featured on Nightline and The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.
This entry was posted in Abuse of Discretion, Gun Control, Maryland, Permit Requirements, Second Amendment Case Law. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Maryland returns unprocessed handgun permit applications

  1. Ken says:

    On their permit applications, some states ask whether you have ever been denied a permit in another jurisdiction.

    I suppose the provision does not constitute self-incrimination because it does not require the affected applicant to confess to a crime?

    (IANAL. Clearly.) 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *